Monday, April 28, 2025
The RAM I ordered is late. 4 days and not shipped…
Back from a walk with Mom...
Not able to do much coding, so am writing again...
Saturday, April 26, 2025
Witchcraft blooming in the west…
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
Parolin for pope…
Monday, April 21, 2025
Fresh funds are in, ate at Uncle Don's...
Friday, April 18, 2025
I have a hard time keeping up with my Facebook friends...
They ask so many questions all at once. And I miss having my orgasm which is put off now since last weekend. We were talking about the dangers of sexual immorality as warned of by the Bible.
I guess we have to document how the talk in mindspace went.
There are 3 main points: sex, orgasm, and fertilization. We have sex because we are made in the image of God: male and female. Sex is therefore well worth it as children of God. I mean, the fact that God has sex and lives forever, and created us, surely means we should have some of what He has, correct-o?
Orgasm is the next point. God never tells us of His orgasms or sex but that he has spiritual orgasms when he completes a cycle of prophecy among us (or the Jews to be pedantic) -as his bride.
The fact that our Father in Heaven is willing to use the workings of our bodies to elucidate his commands among us is surely enough to justify that we should orgasm during sex.
Orgasms are also good for mental health and physical stress relief. Both married and unmarried people should have orgasms as part of their routine 'orgasmic' achievements in whatever it is they do / worship the Lord with.
Fertilization, as the Catholic Church says, is not to be interfered with such as using prophylactics. Why is fertilization sacred? God enforces sexual fertility towards His plans, and the onus is on the woman to seek it out (as in the Biblical story of Ruth -David's grandmother).
So as it is with everything you do in life, sexual presentation is important. Do not be ashamed of sex and always make and keep vows you make with your partner who can function with you, sexually, to achieve fertilization. Vows may be anything depending on the depth of togetherness. This is nothing new.
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
I’m getting the feeling that the rapture is soon…
Sunday, April 13, 2025
A new story begins…
Friday, April 11, 2025
Making a game set of Shrapnel…
Wednesday, April 9, 2025
Devoting time to my game design...
Have stopped coding Tell to focus on project T, my latest game design which is shaping up nicely. I don't think SPM wants my game after all so I will ship it around after some play testing. Not sure how I'll do it. Maybe write the strategy down in math / logic. Will do it by today as it is rather simple.
- To enter as fragments behind armored?
-attacking play with intention to push hard and soak up the counterattack - To enter fragments first then armored?
-to prevent a higher armored from passing thru whole (defensive play) - To fragmentate at some point?
-a high value confronts fragments of lower values - To attack (push off)?
-maximize value to clear a path? - Threat and counter-threat
-each pathway presents unique strategic objectives and pre-division of forces
-simpler pathways should be longer than complex ones
-a punishing game ensues if preparations are not correct
Let us say,
12->421
333 ->12
1->2
The top lane is falling for black so he transfers some power north
333->421
12->12
1->2
But now south is falling
333->421
2->12
11->2
Fragmenting '1' stops red's 2
333->421
12->1
21->2
Red edges in diagonally, overpowering black's '1'
333->421
12->1
21->2
But black pushes off that block from his center advantage
333->421
...->1
21->2
Now red has to block the south with,
333->421
...->...
21->21
And there follows,
->421
...->333
21->21
Giving black a head start to victory but there are other defenders
->421 1
2->333 2
21->1 1
And red slips thru as well! Black needs to fragment like so,
->421 1
2->3 2
21->1 133
His sideways move now blocked again,
->421 1
2->3 ...
21->1 133 2
He must now push aside red's '2' while the passed '2' progresses. Diagonal (fragmenting) gains a square forward. Pushing off gains only a clear path thus there is counterattacking play and formational functionality.
Next we will see a weakest first approach, then rest for the day. Just take things easy.
12->1
333 ->2 421
1->1
Black to move. He must push north to break thru as fragmenting weakens his '333'
12->...
333 ->2 421
1->1
Red may reply diagonally blocking with
12->412
333 ->2
1->1
Black then has to switch centre-north to break thru
333->412
12 ->2
1->1
Now the red main battle group is in danger of push off so,
333->12
412 ->2
1->1
He slips thru with his '4' -the highest value piece. But black has a wall behind him,
1 3->12
2 412 ->233
1 1->1
Red, with his forward weak wall must punch through blacks staggered defences while the '33' marches thru. I reckon black's strategy wins.
Now what about a multi-head attack? The charge of 2 heavy brigades with minimal free fragments against a multi-wall defense.
334->1 2
2 1 1 ->1 2 443
334 ->1 2
The best way to punch through for black could be to avoid the center but the defender behind the 2 walls is stronger by +1 and may push attackers off either side. More later...
The only way is to clear a path by sacrificing one head, then sneak through like so:
->334
2 1 1 ->1 2 443
->334
then,
>334 443
2 1 1 ->1 2
->334
finally,
>334 443
2 1 1 ->1 2
->334